iVue

July 20, 2007

The Dreamers (2003)

Filed under: Foreign-Language, Movies, Must Watch — iVue @ 10:26 am

I saw Bernardo Bertolucci’s “The Dreamers” last night. Actually saw the first half the day before and the remaining last night. Its funny having to split Bertolucci movies across days. Anyway, its a truly engaging experience which leads to a very interestingly told story. This is an abstract film and deriving its essence at different levels is possible, though I admit so far I am nearer to the upper layers.

The Dreamers tells the story of a young american guy named Matthew (Michael Pitt). Matthew is in Paris to learn French and experience Cinema. He spends a lot of time in the Cinemathetique, where he meets the twins – Theo (Louise Garrel) and Isabelle (Eva Green). Matthew is drawn towards the twins as soon as he meets them, and is delighted to accept their offer to move into the twin’s apartment. Slowly he gets drawn into their world which is equal parts beautiful and equal parts disgusting.

Matthew vallicates between admiration and repulsion in the apartment, where the three play cinema related games and quizzes all the time. The failure to win at the games result in awkward and often repulsive treatments. They also have endless debates comparing Keaton to Chaplin and Cliff Richards to Beatles. In the background is the students agitations in Paris against Government interference in Arts and Cinema. Initially all three seem to be involved in it, but slowly they just dissolve away from reality into their own dream-like world.

Matthew is attracted to Isa, and her innocence. But slowly he realizes that he has ‘almost’ similar feelings for Theo. At times it looks that the story will take a ‘triangle’ turn with Isa torn between her love for Matthew and her affection towards Theo. But slowly it dawns on Matthew and the us that Theo and Isa are actually a single entity. They do have separate bodies but somewhere inside they share the same soul. Matthew is repulsed from the ‘immoral closeness’ between the twins and tries to get them to date others. But the bond that the two share is too strong to weaken. Matthew realizes that what he earlier mistakes for an incestuous relationship is actually beyond the realms of understanding. They have an almost psychic connection.

The beauty of the movie is that we slowly delve into the lives of Theo and Isa like Matthew and, just like him go on discovering bit by bit the bonding that the twins share. We share his sense of repulsion early on watching their unusual physical closeness. And like him, we slowly realize the depths of the bond beyond physical love. Bertolucci does this beautifully and never lets a dull moment creep into the narrative.

Watch this to explore beautiful and captivating cinema beyond the boundaries of propriety and norms. Not only the narrative, but the story as well accomplishes just that.

June 25, 2007

Cheeni Kum

Filed under: Movies, Must Watch — iVue @ 2:42 pm

This Saturday, on a rainy afternoon, I rented a DVD of Cheeni Kum, a movie that received glowing reviews. With large expectations I settled down to watch it to realize the DVD print not being the best, not a great talisman of things to come. Thankfully the audio wasnt as bad as it could have been. But, 2 hours 20 minutes later I was more than pleased with the experience and for a change, my large expectations (from the reviews) were quite well exceeded.

At a meta-level, Cheeni Kum can be viewed as 2 different movies stitched together. The first movie is nearly 1:30 hours in length, while the other goes on for about 45 minutes. Without a doubt, the first part of it is slendid, an amazingly written and incredibly acted love story. The second part, while doesnt really measure up to the first, is merely a routine bollywood potboiler.

Although, everyone knows and believes that Cheeni Kum is a love story between a 60 year old man and a 30 year old woman. While, that is certainly true, Cheeni Kum (definitely the first part) can be viewed as just a ‘love-story’. To repeat, you hardly need to add the age-factor as much to the proceedings.

Cheeni Kum tells the story of a london based chef, Buddha (Amitabh Bachchan) who runs, by his own admission, the finest indian restaurant. Buddha is a lonely, arrogant, uncompromising and stuborn man who is just not open to a conversation. He knows what he is upto and know how things are to be done. In short, he is mostly an unsocial character. One fine day his ego is punctured bigtime by this girl, Neena (Tabu) who while dining at his restaurant, not only returns a dish but also turns up with her own version, only much better.

Buddha is shaken out of his slumber. How the two come together forms the crux of the first part of the movie (by first part I infer the 1:30 hours duration of the movie as mentioned earlier). The plot-outline sounds simple, actually is very straightforward. But what really sets this one different from the million other lovestories being told, is its amazing script. It isnt about how Buddha suddenly changes from the person he is, or some life-changing events unfold. Buddha retains his core. He remains the difficult character that we are introduced to earlier. Its only that these very idiosyncracies vibe somewhere in Neena. Neena is a similar strong-headed woman, who knows her mind. Both these people find a sense of comfort together and are drawn to each to other. They are, i guess, not put off by the other’s bluntness, which is the probably the reason that they are still single (Neena is also single at 34).

There are so many moments in the first part which were laugh-out-loud ones for me. And none of these were the Paresh Rawal brand of comedy that is lauded these days. All of these moments arise not out of ‘jokes’ being narrated, but because of the way these characters react to each other and things that happen around. The dialogue is mind-blowing. There are just soo many witty lines all over, its really difficult not to enjoy every single moment of this. Also, the spoken word is realistic and is the language of this day. People talk about everyday non-sense, they dont shy away talking about sex and stuff.

What really works here for me is, that this is more of a conventional love story than a age-difference attraction thing, like Nishabd. Both these characters, ever so slowly get drawn to each other, until a point they both know it, in their hearts. And then they just wait until that moment, the other will profess it first, until which time, both keep playing at it. This is done soo masterfully by the director that how you wish you could see more of such love-stories than the KJ variety one has to live with in Bollywood. Suddenly, the love-story genre opens up as something which is so watchable.

The second part (the final 45 minutes) which mostly unfolds in Delhi and deals with AB and Tabu trying to convince her dad, Paresh Rawal for this unconventional match gets quite over-the-top and irritating. I know this is something which was hard to avoid, as in, the need to show opposition from some quarters atleast, but it doesn’t play out at the same subtle level as the first part. A lot of weird things keep happening, and all these characters play out much more straighter and in a routine Bollywood fashion. Clearly, the second part lacks the bubbling fizz and the charm inhabited by the first part.

Both Amitabh and Tabu inhabit their characters in ways only they can. Now, these days I am in more of an anti-Amitabh phase, with every other flick ‘starring‘ AB. But this one is a genuine movie where AB doesn’t ’star’ in to add value to it or to oblige a friend. The role suits his to the T, and he makes an incredible outing as the loud-mouthed, smooth-talking Buddha, who is going through the throes of a new attraction. Tabu plays a slightly reticient yet equally stubborn Neena.

In supporting roles, Zohra Sehgal playing AB’s mother is quite amazing. Paresh Rawal has ‘thankfully’ a short role as Neena’s father, who is quite obviously shocked to hear about her daughter’s plans. The script has Paresh doing a lot of hocus-pocus which gets quite irritating frankly. Also, personally, I thought the little girl playing 6 year old cancer struck Sexy, who has this special bond with Buddha, a little irritating initally. Later on, though, I think, I could understand the reason for her character to be the way it was.

At another level, Cheeni Kum is about how in life a person will connect with someone not due to a reason or a design, but only out of destiny. Buddha bonds with only two people in this story, one of them is Neena, clearly a misfit for a typical romantic liasion, and the second is his ‘best friend’ Sexy, again clearly a misfit for a typical friendship. As per the more tradional wisdom, neither relationships can be understood. But they do exist, because they just do. It think this was a very beautiful context within the film.

Another underlying theme in the movie has to deal with how short-lived relationships and friendships can be. The Buddha-Sexy friendship ends abrupty with her death. While Buddha-Neena relationship also doesnt have hopes for a long lasting tenure, with Buddha’s age a factor. But even with the short-termness of these relationships, hapiness can be drawn and maybe even preserved.

June 21, 2007

Groundhog Day

Filed under: Movies, Must Watch — iVue @ 3:15 pm

Tuesday night, while surfing through the channels I hit across Sony Pix playing Groundhog Day. BTW, Sony Pix and Zee Studio are the places these days to catch real cinema. Anyway, I had been looking forward to watching Groundhog Day, having read its reviews and rave-outs from lotsa folks.

I was well aware of its time loop based plot, and infact I started on the movie with the first 20 or so minutes already gone. Anyway, I had no trouble latching onto the plot and the story. Its a nicely done feature using the time loop device. Bill Murray plays a jerk of a weatherman who is forced to cover a ‘crap’ ceremony called Groundhog Day on a cold winter day in a small town. Once the tragic day passes away and he wakes up the ‘next’ day, he realizes its Groundhog Day all over again. And so it goes on and on..

The plot seems innovative and it is. But the beauty of the movie is not just its plot, it really about this guy who is forced to overcome ‘himself’ caught in this loop. I could actually argue that even without this time loop concept the story still is forceful and thought-provoking. After all how many of us do run through days that dont seem much different from the ones that just passed.

What elevates this ’simple’ story is the screenplay and editing. Even with the story all about repetition, there is hardly any of it for the viewer. The editing ensure we dont see the reruns of the same mundane stuff all over again. Its (editing) is soo crisp that you only really see what Phil (Bill Murray’s character) tries to do differently this iteration to contrast how his own character is changing.

The screenplay is very well paced and constructed. From being frustrated to trying to use the situation (the most comical parts) to depressive to finally realizing what he ‘can’ really do within the situation, its leads the viewers mood with great skill.

Acting is terrific. Bill Murray is amazing as the Phil. He brings along his own eccentricity to the role, which is soo damn essential to the movie. Andie MacDowell plays the channel producer accompanying Phil, whom he tries to woo sooo damn hard and soo unsucessfully. She has more of a supporting role really, but does pretty well.

I guess I will want to view this one again, right from the starting shot this time. But if you are looking for a thought-provoking yet light movie, this is a good choice.

Adieu

Blog at WordPress.com.